Election incidents immature, irresponsible

Published 4:31 pm Saturday, May 19, 2012

Recently, the Times-Journal received photos and a press release from a local campaign, showing how one of their campaign signs had been allegedly vandalized and damaged.

It was displayed in a prominent area of town and admittedly, the area where the sign was displayed had fallen victim to someone — or a group of someones — not too pleased with that particular candidate’s involvement in the upcoming campaign.

This incident — and ones we are likely to hear a lot about in the coming months — displays the immature nature that is sometimes displayed during election seasons.

Email newsletter signup

We know this type of “stuff” goes on in other places. We know there are signs stolen, defaced and damaged anywhere an election is held. But what does that ever really accomplish? Nothing.

A person has a right to run for political office. And, based on the circus that often surrounds these elections, it is a wonder anyone still steps out and puts their name on the ballot.

During our interviews with candidates — regardless of whether or not we agree with their policies or their politics — we express our admiration and appreciation for them seeking public office. Would you do it? For many the answer is no.

We oftentimes question whether the best and brightest among us seek public office. But what we do not question is the heart of those who do.

We find ourselves just over three months from municipal elections in Selma, Valley Grande and Orrville, and we are sure the shenanigans that often accompany these elections will again rear their silly little heads.

But as voters, we have a choice to ignore the games and focus on the message; focus on the records and focus on which person is best suited to serve in public office.

It’s going to be a long and interesting three months. It is our hope it is a time of substance, good debate and quality campaigning. Our cities and towns deserve nothing less.