Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 3 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
U.S. EPA approves Perry County for coal ash dumping
Published Thursday, July 2, 2009
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has approved the Arrowhead Landfill about four miles from here as a dumping site for coal ash from a December accident at a Tennessee Valley Authority power plant.
The EPA made the announcement Thursday of TVA's plan to transfer the coal ash from the Emory River near the TVA Kingston removal site in Roane County, Tenn., to Perry County.
"EPA's administrative order on consent with TVA requires that the coal ash from the site be disposed of in accordance with the most stringent protective disposal standards for municipal solid waste landfills," the EPA announced in a statement. "The Arrowhead Landfill was selected because it meets and exceeds these standards."
It's expected about 3 million of the total 5.4 million cubic yards of ash spilled at the Kingston site will wind up in the Perry County landfill.
The EPA says the landfill has the capacity to take the material. The landfill has a clay liner and a polyethylene liner and a leachate collection system that gathers liquids and pumps them for treatment.
Norfolk Southern has a direct rail line from the TVA site to the landfill, which is how the ash will travel.
County officials have approved of the dumping of the material, saying the heavy metals contained in the ash are no more dangerous than those already existing in the earth or other places. Heavy metals are arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium and zinc. The EPA says the ash contains "low levels" of these metals.
Michael Churchman, executive director of the Alabama Environmental Council, raised opposition to the move, saying it takes advantage of an area where U.S. Census statistics show 31 percent of families live in poverty and about 88 percent of the local residents are African-American.
The plan says about 85 loaded railcars would travel through Alabama every two days. The project could take about a year.
The Associated Press contributed to this story.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?
Comments
Posted by jonsavant (anonymous) on July 3, 2009 at 8:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Did anyone bother to find out the real effects that this ash will have on the underground waters? Anyone that accepts as fact anything our criminal government says without an in depth investigaion; further investigate those that did or is doing the investigation - if anything harmful results later - what ever the degree of harm that results, God is justified in letting you suffer.
Posted by yellowroseofTexas (anonymous) on July 3, 2009 at 12:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We don't have enough electoral votes in this part of the South. What do you expect from a government in which Congress votes on a bill without reading it first and analyzing the effects of its contents? Are you aware that Congress is making sure that if you ever try to sell your home it will have to meet stringent environmental guidelines. To meet these, the homeowner could have to pay out thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars or not be able to sell. I am for mandatory recycling, but this mess is ridiculous. If people had the money to improve their homes environmentally, those with common sense would do so.
Posted by Liberty (anonymous) on July 8, 2009 at 9:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, what's the surprise here?
A few lines from a new favorite song, "Everybody's Workin' For the Man":
"The fox is in the hen house, cows are in the corn,
Rooster's too scared to crow.
Fat cats are up in the farmhouse now,
Doin' the do-si-do.
The broadcasters bought off the FCC,
Big oil's got the EPA.
Halliburton - Halliburton - Halliburton - Halliburton,
What else do you have to say?"
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)